Image | Posted on by | 1 Comment


I never thought I would ever see such stupidity:

All for a fucking yippy, yappy, lappy, barky, bitey dog.

It’s Arizona, FFS. A coyote or a fox made it a meal.

After spending months looking for his lost pet Chihuahua, a desperate Tucson man has announced that he is offering his one bedroom home and the plot of land that comes with it to whoever brings his dog back to him.

Eddie Collins lost his beloved pet, Jenny, back in April and he has spent every day since trying to find her. After searching every place he could think of, plastering posters all over Tucson and visiting dog shelters every day, he decided to increase his chances of finding Jenny by offering his most prized material possession as a reward. Whoever finds Jenny and brings her back, will receive Eddie’s one-bedroom apartment, his workshop and a plot of land in return.

“I’ve looked everywhere, I go to the dog pound every day, I go to the humane society,” a heartbroken Eddie Collins told News 4 Tucson. “I’m offering a piece of property with a one-bedroom home. I’m willing to give the land, the trailer, the workshop, all of it free and clear, no questions asked. I just want to have Jenny back.”

A photo of Eddie holding Jenny’s picture and a message that reads “Have you seen me? They took me out of Circle K. My dad is looking for me. If you help me get back home, he will give you a one-bedroom house, a workshop and a plot of land. If you know where I am, help me get home safely and everything will be yours. My name is Jenny” has been doing the rounds on social media for the past three weeks. Collin hopes that his gesture will both bring attention to his story and motivate people to help find his dog.

“Life matters no matter what is it, whether it be a chipmunk or a squirrel. It depends on the owner, the person and what they care for. For me, it’s not about material things, it’s about her,” Collins said, “She’s a loved one, she’s part of my family.”

Unfortunately, so far Jenny has still not been found.

Posted in Misc | 5 Comments


A family is being billed $300K for hospital bills after their daughter was killed, her baby removed by her murderers, etc.

So here is a picture of the mother-daughter team that killed the girl.

The guy is the woman’s “boyfriend.”

Take another look at the mother and tell me he’s not with her to get to the daughter.

The family of a Chicago infant who died last month after being cut from his mother’s womb was billed over $300,000 for his – and his suspected killer’s – care in addition to being misidentified by the hospital using the suspect’s surname, reports say.

Marlen Ochoa-Lopez was killed on April 23 after Clarisa Figueroa, 46, and her daughter Desiree, 26, lured the 19-year-old to their apartment with the promise of free baby clothes. Instead, police say the pair strangled the young mother and cut the infant from her womb.

The infant, Yovanny Jadiel Lopez, was taken to the hospital after the suspects called 911 to report that he had stopped breathing. He died on June 14 after being on life support for three weeks.

The pair was charged with first-degree murder for Yovanny’s death Thursday in addition to at least two dozen counts of first-degree murder, aggravated kidnapping, dismemberment of a human body and concealment of a homicide.

A new report from the Chicago Sun-Times revealed that the grieving family has now been slapped with over $300,000 in medical bills from the Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn where the infant and one of the suspects was treated.

Frank Avila, an attorney for the Ochoa-Lopez family, told the paper that the family has received bills for hundreds of thousands of dollars dating back to April 23 that charged the family for the infant’s care. They were also billed for the care of Figuero who initially claimed to hospital staff that she was the birth mother.


According to the report, one bill dated June 3 informed the family that their “balance is past due. Please pay the entire amount … to avoid being referred to an external collection agency.”

To add further insult, the bills identified Yovanny with the suspect’s last name, “Figuero, boy,” several times until at least May 7.

Advocate’s Christ Medical Center said in a statement to Fox News Friday that they “regret” their mistake, noting at least one bill that should not have been sent.

“Our hearts and prayers continue to be with the Ochoa-Lopez family during this difficult time. We have had discussions with the family regarding inadvertent billing and we regret this error. We take our obligation to patient privacy seriously, and therefore are unable to comment further regarding care, services or billing,” the statement read.

The hospital declined to confirm the total cost of the bills, if the family was charged for the care of one of the suspects or if the child was incorrectly identified on the bill using the suspect’s last name.

Thursday’s report from the Sun-Times also stated that the family has not been provided with Yovanny’s medical records and that the original birth certificate continues to list Clarisa Figueroa as the child’s mother.

Posted in Misc | 1 Comment


Republicans introduce measure to label antifa a terror organization.

Two Republican senators have introduced a resolution to “properly identify” Antifa as “domestic terrorists” who use violence against their opponents while being protected by “liberal privilege.”

The resolution, introduced on Thursday by Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), cites numerous instances of intimidation and outright violence by left-wing radicals as the basis for their formal designation as domestic terrorists. In particular, it mentions recent clashes in Portland, Oregon, that saw far-left Rose City Antifa facing off with far-right Proud Boys and police.

The highlight of the late June skirmish was the assault on journalist Andy Ngo by Antifa protesters. The Quillette reporter was beaten and doused with milkshakes that, according to some accounts, contained quick-drying cement. Ngo also said his camera equipment was stolen.

Also on rt.com GoFundMe for Andy Ngo, journalist assaulted by Antifa, raises $100k in less than 24 hours The attack sparked a Twitter moment in support of the journalist and spawned a ‘Protect Andy Ngo Fund’ GoFundMe campaign that topped its stated goal of $50,000 four-fold.

Commenting on the proposed legislation, Cassidy described Antifa as “violent masked bullies who ‘fight fascism’ with actual fascism, protected by liberal privilege.”

Apart from the incident with Ngo, the two senators cite reports of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers being doxxed and intimidated by left-wing protesters, including a reported incident with an ICE officer who “had his name and photo plastered on flyers outside his home accusing him of being part of the ‘Gestapo’,” the notorious Nazi secret police.

While the resolution appears to refer to the Antifa movement in general, it specifically takes aim at the Oregon-based Rose City Antifa, which the authors state “explicitly rejects the authority of law enforcement officers in the United States, and Federal, State, and local governments.”

Any use of violence, including, against “individuals that the group labels as fascist” is inadmissible, the resolution argues. While denouncing the left-wing terrorism, Cruz and Cassidy also note the need to fight far-right violence, urging the federal government “to redouble its efforts, using all available and appropriate tools, to combat the spread of all forms of domestic terrorism, including White supremacist terrorism.”

Cruz and Cassidy’s attempt to put the ‘terrorist’ label on the Antifa movement would require changing or at least clarifying federal law. In response to an August 2017 petition to formally recognize Antifa as a terrorist entity, the White House said that “although Federal law provides a mechanism to designate and sanction foreign terrorist organizations and foreign state sponsors of terrorism, there is currently no analogous mechanism for formally designating domestic terrorist organizations.”

Posted in Misc | 4 Comments


Remember when, back during the Clinton era, that kid from Cuba was sent back?

Democrats demanded it.

I agreed with them because that’s where his father was.

Republicans wanted him to stay.

The NY Times took the side of the democrats to “send him back!!”

Funny how they’ve changed their tune and no one is calling them on it.

”America is a country where the rule of law rules. This picture (a U.S. Marshall pointing a genuine assault rifle at a terrified 6 year old Hispanic immigrant, whose mother had just drowned or been eaten alive by sharks) illustrates what happens to those who defy the rule of law and how far our government and people will go to preserve it. Come all ye who understand that.” (The New York Times’ Thomas Friedman.)

TAKE THAT! — you uppity Cuban-American ingrates! But The New York Times’ Tom Friedman (who had an obscenity-laced meltdown on CNN last week sputtering against President Trump’s “racism” and “xenophobia”…blah…blah) had barely started venting his spleen against those insufferable Cuban-Americans.

No siree. Friedman’s rage against those loudmouthed, entitled and ungrateful refugees and his passion for the U.S. Constitution and the golden rule of U.S. immigration law (so curiously absent lately) was barely spent. To wit:

“One only hopes that this affair will remind the extremists among the Miami Cubans that they are not living in their own private country, that they cannot do whatever they please and that they may hate Fidel Castro more than they love the U.S. Constitution — but that doesn’t apply to the rest of us.”

WHOO!-WHOO! In other words: when they get here, dusky foreigner/immigrants should be grateful, should shut-up and should meekly abide by the laws of the nation that provided them asylum, freedom and opportunity!

WOW! And all that ranting by the same New York Times that’s been on a non-stop, multi-year tantrum against Donald Trump (as both candidate and president) and his supporters for their “xenophobia” and “nativism,”…blah…blah—in brief, for the president’s attempt to enforce U.S. law!

Alas! The Times’ righteous fury against those uppity Cuban-Americans still wasn’t spent:

“One also hopes that now that Ms. Reno has ended the kidnapping of Elian by the Miami Cubans, the other hard-nosed lady in the cabinet, Madeleine Albright, will end the Miami Cubans’ kidnapping of U.S. Cuba policy as well.”

Got it, amigos? U.S. foreign policy “kidnapped” by ungrateful –but rich and powerful –cosmopolitans with dual loyalty! And here I’d always associated this battle-cry with the “alt-right,” (so-called,) who aim it against Thomas Friedman’s own ethnic kinsmen?

For the record, as lawyer and legal expert David Limbaugh meticulously documented in his book Absolute Power: on Dec. 1, 1999 the INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) established that Miami-based uncle Lazaro Gonzalez (among Friedman’s “U.S. hating and law-breaking extremists!”) was indeed Elian Gonzalez’s legal custodian and Florida’s family court was indeed the lawful place to arbitrate further issues.

AH! But a few days later Fidel Castro stuck his fingers in his mouth, issued a sharp whistle of summons and instantly the Media/Democrat complex (including the Clinton team) was all around him, tails wagging and tongues hanging, eager to start taking their usual dictation regarding his every whim and wish….but we’ve exposed the details of that legal and moral atrocity often hereabouts.

Alas, liberal Friedman’s bigotry is a historic bigotry by the Media /Democrat complex against the most lopsidedly Republican-registered ethnic group in the U.S. Indeed, while “white” American voters voted Trump at a rate of 56%, Cuban American voters went for the Republican candidate at a rate of 58%–or perhaps even higher.

Astoundingly, this represents a slight decline —given the usual generational differences– of traditional Cuban-American support for Republican candidates. While an “enlightened” majority (56 percent) of their countrymen voted for Obama in 2008, a miniscule portion (33 percent) of those “insufferably reactionary” Cuban- Americans did so.

Gosh? What could possibly account for this phenomenon?

Well, if the quip “you had to be there” applies anywhere, it’s in explaining the voting habits of Americans of Cuban heritage. By “there” I mean in a communist country—but not as a tourist! And not like Bill De Blasio as a honeymooner! And not like Jeff Flake getting his marching orders and talking points!

And especially not like U.S. President Obama in March, 2016 behaving in front of Cuban dictator Raul Castro as Japanese minister Shigematsu behaved in front of Gen. Douglas MacArthur aboard the USS Missouri n Sept. 1945!

No, amigos. Nothing like those incidents. No, instead I mean as a subject of a communist nation’s rulers. Voting Republican en-masse then becomes a reflex, an instinct—and one that drives liberals absolutely apoplectic.

Let’s take a perfectly representative liberal Democrat: Michael Moore. And if you think Moore is not representative of the latter-day Democratic Party, recall that at their Convention in 2004 a smirking Michael Moore was feted by the Democratic Party as their honored guest. He sat in a place of honor right next to Jimmy Carter.

“Cuban-Americans,” wrote this honored guest of the Democratic Party in his book “Downsize This,” “are responsible for sleaze and influence-peddling in American politics. In every incident of national torment that has deflated our country for the past three decades, Cuban exiles are always present and involved.”

Can you imagine the Media/Democrat uproar if a prominent Trump-supporting celebrity—say Jon Voight or Ted Nugent– denounced Mexican-Americans en masse for “tormenting our country with sleaze?” We’d never hear the end of it!

“Truly disgusting!” was how NBC’s Bryant Gumbel characterized the Cuban-Americans who were (peacefully) protesting the joint shanghaiing of Elian Gonzalez by the Clinton administration and Castro regime. Yet we search in utter vain for the slightest hint by Gumbel (or any mainstream media pundit) that any demonstration by Black Lives Matter for instance might hint at “disgusting” behavior, despite the wholesale looting and vicious beatings that always characterize them.

Bottom line: given all the above factors, when it comes to “deplorable” behavior and causing liberal heads to explode, Cuban-Americans in liberal eyes have long been –to quote Freddie Mercury—the champion deplorables of the world!

Posted in Misc | 3 Comments


Miss Michigan supports Trump, gets stripped of title for merely repeating facts that are on the news.

The Miss World America organization is under fire after stripping a President Donald Trump–supporting model of her Miss Michigan title over “racist, Islamophobic, and insensitive” tweets.

Kathy Zhu, 20, is a University of Michigan student who won the 2019 Michigan World America title on Sunday. However, her reign was cut short after organizers became aware of Zhu’s controversial Twitter account days later.

Zhu took to Twitter to post screenshots of Thursday’s email and text exchanges with the state director of Miss World America (not to be confused with Miss Universe, formerly owned by Trump), Laurie DeJack, who said that the MWA organization came across Zhu’s account, where the beauty queen goes by “Political Kathy” and felt that her content was in violation of the organization’s rules and conditions.

“Do not go out representing Michigan World America. We do have a problem,” a text from DeJack reads. “Just notifying you that we have an issue and we will need to talk!”

A later email that included the national director and chief operating office of MWA went on to explain that Zhu allegedly violated the contestant requirement of “being of good character” and not being “likely to bring into disrepute Miss World America or any person associated with the organization.”

“Your social media accounts contain offensive, insensitive and inappropriate content,” DeLaurie wrote. “Therefore, and effective immediately, MWA does not recognize you as a participant of any sort or in any capacity as it relates to any and all events of MWA.”

Zhu claimed that the decision was made on the basis of her refusal to try on a hijab in 2018 — something that sparked controversy amongst her fellow University of Central Florida students on World Hijab Day on campus — as well as over her tweets about black gun violence.

She tells Yahoo Lifestyle that the pageant’s organizers were made aware of all of her social media pages before they accepted her as a contestant — although they claim that they were misled by Zhu’s legal Chinese name.

“I feel like it’s their fault for not vetting me properly before they signed me up for this,” Zhu says. “They complained that I didn’t give them my name, but I did. They referred to me as Kathy and they knew me as Kathy but I signed my legal papers with my legal name, obviously. So it was just really weird how they were like, ‘Oh, well you misled us.’ I mean, I sent them everything. So they should’ve known better to check my stuff before they continued with this.”

Still, Zhu says that the entire controversy has more to do with an issue larger than the organization’s prior awareness of her social media.

“They’re not letting people that represent another side of the story represent them,” she explains. “They only want someone to say things that people want to hear. And there’s a lot of things in this world that it’s hard to hear, but it’s the truth.”

The beauty queen went on to say that she had no intention of using her platform for divisive politics, but instead to encourage people to use their voice, no matter the cause.

Ultimately, however, MWA wasn’t willing to give Zhu that opportunity.

“It’s not even about a crown or a pageant,” she says, “It’s about the fact that people really do discriminate against people with conservative views.”

Now, people are showing their support for the pageant queen on Twitter — including Joy Villa — and echoing the belief that she was stripped of the title because of her political stance.

Posted in Misc | 2 Comments


A professor is under fire for merely suggesting we’d be better off as a country if we didn’t have as many beaners, niggers, ragheads, etc.

She’s absolutely right given the level of welfare these leeches consume and the number of crimes they commit.

But since she espouses views that don’t support criminality and liberal ideas then she needs to be fired.

If it were a black bitch saying we’d be better off with fewer racist whites she’d be lauded as a forward, progressive thinker.

The University of Pennsylvania is facing calls to fire a professor over comments she purportedly made at a conservative conference last weekend, insinuating that the U.S. would be better off with “more whites and fewer nonwhites.”

Amy Wax made the supposed remarks during three-day Edmund Burke Foundation’s National Conservatism conference in Washington D.C. that lasted from Sunday through Tuesday.

During a panel discussion on immigration, Wax made the comments that inflamed a social media firestorm. A recording or exact transcript of the remarks isn’t yet available online.

According to Vox, Wax said immigrants are responsible for an increase in “litter” and suggested the U.S. should favor immigrants from Western countries rather than non-Western ones.

“Our country will be better off with more whites and fewer nonwhites.”

— Amy Wax, according to Vox

“Our country will be better off with more whites and fewer nonwhites,” she said, according to the outlet, adding that her comments weren’t racially-charged because the opposition to nonwhite immigrants stems from culture not biology.

“Conservatives need a realistic approach to immigration that… preserves the United States as a Western and First World nation,” she added. “We are better off if we are dominated numerically … by people from the First World, from the West, than by people who are from less advanced countries.”

But others have accused Vox of not providing proper context to Wax’s quote, with Yoram Hazony, author of the influential 2018 book “The Virtue of Nationalism,” saying that at no point did the professor advocated for fewer “nonwhite” immigrants.

Despite confusion over the exact context of the remarks, many have called out Wax for her comments, with some former students saying they will suspend donations to the university if Wax remains on staff.

“Hey @Penn, I’m an alumna who is more than happy to end my regular contributions to the University if Amy Wax remains on staff,” wrote Sara Paige. “This is certainly not the first time Wax has made abhorrent statements as a Penn professor, but it absolutely needs to be the last.”

The university spokesperson told PhillyVoice that the institution stands behind Wax on the basis of free speech, but noted that the individual faculty members don’t represent the university.

“As a member of the faculty Professor Wax is free to express her opinions as provided in Penn’s policies protecting academic freedom and open expression. It is also the case that views of individual faculty members do not represent the views of the institution, but rather their own personal beliefs,” the statement read.

Posted in Misc | Leave a comment