Is This Another Attempted Coup d’état

It seems the Intelligence Community requirements for a whistleblower to have first hand information was changed right before the complaint against President Trump was filed.

Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed.

The complaint alleges that President Donald Trump broke the law during a phone call with the Ukrainian president. In his complaint, which was dated August 12, 2019, the complainant acknowledged he was “not a direct witness” to the wrongdoing he claims Trump committed.

A previous version of the whistleblower complaint document, which the ICIG and DNI until recently provided to potential whistleblowers, declared that any complaint must contain only first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing and that complaints that provide only hearsay, rumor, or gossip would be rejected.

Mark Levin, who himself is a practicing lawyer, says the complaint looks more like a legal brief vetted through lawyers.   This is another well coordinated attack against a duly elected president.

 

This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Is This Another Attempted Coup d’état

  1. drew45.8 says:

    Sedition charges, show trials, mass public hangings. The spooks are weaponized against the people and the legitimate government. Villagers with pitchforks and torches need to assemble ASAP.

  2. bogsidebunny says:

    Us villagers are too complacent, too unorganized, too out numbered and out-armed by the military and cops who will follow the marching orders of their masters and too college Socialist brainwashed. That’s why ole critical thinking me sayeth for the thousandth time:

    We’re DOOMED!

    I wish I was an emotional reaction person who still sees the “good guys in white hats winning at the end, but it ain’t gonna happen.

  3. Leonard Jones says:

    This doesn’t sound like a conspiracy at all does it, boys? The word August keeps
    popping up in this latest coup attempt. It was the month the so-called “whistleblower”
    filed his complaint, and Congress got their hands on it. The dumb fuck Democrats
    have done two things; Once again they left a trail of conspiracies that even Mr.
    Magoo could have followed, and they may have officially crossed the line into
    treasonous activities. I don’t give a shit if impeachment is a civil proceeding, the
    defendant is entitled to all the protections in the US Constitution.

    Even if these arrogant pricks succeed in impeaching the president in the House, a
    trial in the Senate is necessary. What they are doing, in this case, is so over the
    top that they are subjecting themselves to charges of deprivation of rights under
    the color of law at the very least. These morons are so blinded by their TDS,
    they are setting themselves up for prosecution. This is so blatant that if they
    manage to impeach Trump in the House, the Chief Justice of the Supreme
    Court would have no choice but to vacate the House proceedings.

    Look up Title 18 USC section 242 which covers deprivation of rights under color
    of law. I am attaching a link to 16th American jurisprudence 177. At the very
    least everyone involved will be fired and forever barred from public office.
    They just shit in their mess kits. I cannot believe I remembered something
    I read in 1980:

    https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/question-unconstitutional-official-acts-16-am-jur-2d-sec-177-late-2d-sec-256.690288/

Comments are closed.