Was This Shooting Justified?

A couple of ground apes attacked a woman and cold-cocked her a few times. It was inside a Wal Mart in Pennsylvania. The question of the day is, “Was this a justified shooting?”

The video of the attack is poor and it’s only on Twatter as far as I can tell. Check it out, read the article, and let us know your opinion. I read the article and subsequent comments and drew my own concluion almost immediately. I’ll see what you all say before posting my own comment.

Basically, she torched off five rounds, then followed one of the women and torched off two more rounds. The DA says the first five were justified and the last two were not. She was charged with aggravated assault. What say you?

About RedneckGeezer

Backwoods ignorant redneck. (Or so they say...)
This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Was This Shooting Justified?

  1. Dan says:

    Under the law as written ( with minor differences in wording) in ALL states, use of lethal force is justified up and until the threat ends. Once the attackers fled the use of deadly force became illegal. Having said that I have little doubt the arrest and charges are politically motivated.

  2. Call me Infidel says:

    I agree with Dan, initially if she feared for her life she was justified in putting lead in their pencil but the follow up does look to me like she went too far and she will struggle to defend that. Though as they point out its easy to judge when you are not the one who got pummelled.

  3. BobF says:

    I agree with Dan.

  4. redneckgeezer says:

    As the attackers fled, the threat diminished. She becomes culpable for her actions. But… what really “hit me” when I read this, was that this woman was pummeled about the head. These bitches cold cocked her – multiple times. Evidence shows this happening. If I were her lawyer, I’d have her to a neurologist so quickly it would make HER head spin. I think it would be pretty easy to show impairment in her decision making process due to head trauma. I can’t imagine a jury having an issue with this. Dan is right, it’s all politically motivated anyway. It’s still gonna cost her an arm and a leg.The most unfortunate part of the story is that the first two shots didn’t kill both the attackers instantly.

    Pictures show the whole thing. What I’d really like to know is the motive. For all we know, she assaulted one of the attackers children or sold drugs to school kids. No clue.

  5. Toxic Deplorable Racist B Woodman says:

    What RedNeckG said. PLUS, there have been instances where the victim feared feared for their life that the perp would return to attack again, so the victim was found “not guilty” of the follow up shootings as the perp ran away.
    And yes, this whole ordeal will cost the victim woman an arm and a leg. Too bad.

  6. Leonard Jones says:

    I’m for bringing back the fleeing felon rule. Continue to run from the police,
    one verbal warning, one warning shot and one more between the shoulder
    blades. Does anyone have any idea how effective this would be with high-
    speed freeway chases?

  7. redneckgeezer says:

    Woodie, somehow your msg had to be approved, which I just did. I think your minor change in name needed approval, who knows.

Comments are closed.