I had these thoughts some time ago and finally put them down on paper my computer.

Two days ago I found this story and wondered where I’d put what I had jotted down.

So here they are.

My thoughts first and the story to follow in which companies are trying to get more efficiency out of their workers.

I think if every CEO were to read what I wrote and implement it they’d get their 10% efficiency in no time.

Next time you’re out and about take a really close look at workers in the above named (and other) stores.

Ever notice how lethargically they move? I swear to God, I can not force myself to walk so slowly. You’d think they were walking a casket into church or a bride down an aisle. That’s how slowly.

I was in a Wal-Mart once and this guy had to move sausages from a box to the shelf.

He’d go to the box, slowly, grab two sausages (one in each hand), walk to the shelf, lethargically, of course, and place them there.

Me, I’d have grabbed an entire box, quick stepped to the shelf and laid those bad-boys out in no time.

Just think: if all employees moved at 25% faster speeds how much cheaper our stuff would be.


America’s retailers, struggling to fill jobs, have been raising pay to try to keep and attract enough employees. Now, some stores want something in return: A more efficient worker.

To that end, retailers, fast food restaurants and other lower-wage employers are boosting investment in technology and redesigning stores. Walmart is automating its truck unloading to require fewer workers on loading docks. Kohl’s is using more hand-held devices to speed check-outs and restock shelves. McDonald’s is increasingly replacing cashiers with self-service kiosks to free up workers for table service.

Retail workers, though comparatively low-paid, have enjoyed some of the best wage gains in the past year. Their hourly pay rose 4.3 percent in November from a year earlier — much faster than such higher-wage industries as manufacturing, where pay rose 1.8 percent.

Walmart raised its starting pay to $11 an hour this year. Target’s minimum is $12, with plans to make it $15 by 2020. Amazon’s starting wage leapt to $15 in November. And more than 20 states have raised minimum wages above the federal $7.25 an hour. California and Washington state’s wage floors will reach $12 on Jan. 1. New York’s will be $11.80.

Even as they’ve absorbed higher labor costs, most retailers remain reluctant to pass them on to customers in the form of price increases. American consumers have grown increasingly insistent on bargain prices — in part a hangover from the Great Recession, in part a function of online price-comparison tools. Retailers are loath to alienate them and send them looking for alternative sellers.

“It’s extraordinarily hard for retailers to systematically raise prices,” said Jason Goldberg, chief commerce strategy officer at Publicis Communications NA, a digital consulting agency. “These days, everyone’s prices are way more transparent. It’s just one click away from your super computer in your pocket.”

So unless companies are willing to eat all or part of their higher labor costs, they need to increase their workers’ efficiency. A company’s wage increase of 10 percent can be offset if its employees produce 10 percent more.

“We need …meaningful improvements” in productivity, said Greg Foran, CEO of Walmart’s US division. “Pricing generally isn’t going up. It’s going to come down as competition intensifies.”

Though higher wages are driving retailers to make workers more efficient, cost isn’t the only factor. The companies are also under intensifying pressure to speed delivery times of online orders to compete with Amazon and please customers who expect fast delivery.

Walmart employees can now use mobile devices to check whether an item is in stock and avoid trekking to distant storerooms. The phones also send alerts when an item needs a price change and directs workers to those items.

And in a cluster of stores, Walmart has deployed robots that monitor stockpiles and can send photos of empty shelves to employees’ phones. The information is sent to a conveyer system that scans boxes being unloaded from trucks. Workers then organize the boxes for delivery to the sales floor. The system has slashed the number of people needed to unload trucks.

“When I first started working for Walmart, we would unload the truck and you would have associates running all over the backroom trying to find out where to put things,” said Ty Ford, who has worked at Walmart in Houston for eight years. “It wasn’t organized in any way.”

One technology being tested is “smart glasses,” which display information on the lenses so workers can identify items from online orders for curbside pickup. The glasses can identify which items to pick, thereby saving time that would be spent looking at phones.

To try to raise productivity, retailers are turning mainly to technology rather that hounding employees to work harder. But pressure does creep in: At Target, workers who carry online orders to shoppers’ cars now hear a honking horn on their devices, instead of a generic bell, to signify that customers are waiting.

Jaana Remes, an economist at McKinsey Global Institute, noted that after the Great Recession, stagnant pay reduced the incentive for employers to invest in labor-saving technology. Now, that’s starting to reverse. Remes pointed out that labor-saving technology is more common in countries where pay is higher. Self-serve restaurants, for example, are more prevalent in Scandinavia and Japan than in the United States.

“When have you seen grocery baggers in Europe?” Remes said. “We still have them in the U.S.”

But perhaps not for long. For this year’s holiday shopping season, some Target employees began using mobile devices to check out shoppers. Under pressure from online retailers, Target is also investing in technology to transform its stores into shipping hubs to cut costs and speed deliveries.

CEO Brian Cornell said in November that the company wants to achieve efficiencies to help offset the cost of higher pay and other investments. So Target has redesigned the back rooms of most of its 1,800 stores to shave seconds off picking and packing and to accelerate online shipments.

During a recent tour of a Target in Edison, New Jersey, workers undertook specialized tasks in assembly line operations in a space the size of about 12 of its parking spaces. Once filled, carts are placed on marked spots within arm’s reach of workers who pack shipments. Apps reveal how much tape to use for each box. Packers use foot pedals to dispense inflated air pillows to cushion items when boxed.

It’s unclear whether retailers’ efforts will be enough to boost the overall productivity of America’s workforce, which has been mired in anemic growth since the Great Recession. Productivity — output per hour worked — is critical to rising living standards. An economy can expand only as fast as its working age population and the growth in worker productivity.

Though U.S. productivity has picked up a bit this year, it grew just 1.3 percent in the July-September quarter from a year earlier. That’s only about half the pace of the 1990s and early 2000s.

Economists have suggested several theories to explain chronically weak productivity growth. Some say the U.S. is just less innovative than in the past. Others think the government has trouble measuring the impact of free or low-cost inventions, like search engines and music streaming services, and that workers are actually more productive than we think.

Many economists also note that it can take time for businesses to determine how best to capitalize on new technologies. Retailers are still experimenting, for example, with mobile devices, which have been in use for at least a decade. Personal computers began appearing in offices in the 1980s but didn’t accelerate productivity until much later.

Kohl’s is just now stepping up its use of mobile technology to help employees restock shelves more efficiently and equipping some with iPad devices for faster checkouts.

“We know that there will be continued headwinds from wage pressures,” Bruce Besanko, Kohl’s chief financial officer, told industry analysts last month. “And so we know that we needed to find more ways” to cut costs.

To save on labor costs, McDonald’s has installed self-service kiosks in 4,000 of its U.S. restaurants this year. All told, about half its roughly 14,000 U.S. restaurants now include them.

“When you’ve got your two major lines — food and labor — both with inflationary increases, that puts pressure on the bottom line,” McDonald’s CEO Stephen Easterbrook said in October.

Mooyah, a hamburger chain with 80 restaurants mostly in the South, is responding to higher wages by reconfiguring its new restaurants to enable cooks to function like basketball players — pivoting on one foot when necessary but mostly remaining in place. During peak hours, this system is intended to enable five employees to do work that now requires up to nine. (Mooyah is owned by the private equity firm Balmoral Funds.)

“They need to do everything without steps,” said Michael Mabry, Mooyah’s chief operating officer.

Mabry said that because the store has had to raise pay in recent years, “we’ve got to offset that somewhere, and it can’t all flow through to the guest, because they’ll push back on pricing.”

How all this affects most workers isn’t quite clear.

Eric Hoffman, who worked at Walmart distribution centers for 13 years, is all too familiar with a darker side of companies seeking to boost productivity. Hoffman, 33, used to enjoy his job loading cases onto a shipping dock for Walmart, most recently in Winter Haven, Florida. He earned $21.90 an hour and received bonuses for exceeding production quotas.

But over the past year, he said, managers raised quotas and shortened the time available to do tasks. And there was an added pressure, too: Management, Hoffman said, told workers they had to “beat Amazon.”

“You guys don’t want to become like Kmart,” his bosses would say.

Hoffman quit his job five months ago to take an apprenticeship at an electrical company, installing equipment that pays about $10.50 per hour.

“The stress is gone,” Hoffman said.

In response, Walmart said it’s been testing ways to increase production in light of rising competition, online demand and higher labor costs.

“We are focused on making our operations more effective and efficient while innovating to make work easier and more engaging for our associates,” said Michelle Malashock, a spokeswoman, who declined to address Hoffman’s specific complaints.

Transitions to new technologies and business processes, Remes noted, can be difficult and disruptive for employees.

“The good news is that tech-enabled productivity gains help make workers’ time more valuable and could lead to wage gains,” she said. “They also incentivize companies to invest on worker skills, opening up better opportunities in the future.”

This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. bogsidebunny says:

    Workers lethargic? Feed ’em a diet of strong amphetamines. Low-motivated, under educated slugs are likely already mellowed out on weed and maybe soapers, so those chemicals need to be overcome with some heavy duty central nervous system stimulant. Pump those blood pressure, rapid heartbeat chemicals in. Sure it’ll probably result in slicing off 20 years of their life-spans, but with too many people already on the planet hundreds of thousands of premature sudden deaths from heart attacks and stroke, thus the need for long term expensive medical care is just the boost the health insurance industry needs.

  2. dekare says:

    We’ve all seen this…the lazy ass worker who thinks he or she is worth a professional salary, but works like someone who thinks they above hard work. The shuffle as they walk, they give not a shit about the customer, they take no pride in making their company better, but continuously demand to be paid higher and higher wages…that they do not deserve.

    And if wages rise, you better damned well believe these human slugs are not going to get a job. As of now, companies put up with these sloth employees by telling themselves that at least they work cheap, and so not much is expected from them. But when that $9 an hour job starts paying $15, you better damned well believe that bosses are going to expect to get their monies worth. And with a better class of worker applying for these now higher paying jobs…the human slugs that don’t give a shit, will find themselves unable to compete or find work. They will now be up against others who have a degree in something, and an enthusiastic attitude.

    What…did they think the pay raises they demanded would be given without expecting anything in return? Nope, you now better hustle or they will find someone who will.

    Another way these leeches have legislated themselves out of a job. The law of unintended consequences will see that all things balance out in the end. This mandated minimum raise didn’t help the average slug worker…it priced him out of a job.

  3. Eskyman says:

    Back in my yoot I worked all sorts of jobs while wandering over the globe. In Australia back in the early ’70s I did some construction work, which paid well but which I found most frustrating. None of the other workers wanted to move at more than a snail’s pace, and if the supervisor wasn’t looking they’d do nothing at all.

    I just wanted to get the job done, and go on to the next one; this wasn’t a popular option among my workmates. They could spend literally all day doing absolutely nothing and be proud & happy about it: they’d “put one over” on the boss. It got so bad that I had to take my break time someplace else than the group I was working with, as those guys didn’t much like me or my attitude. The feeling was mutual, and I was very glad when it was time for me to move on!

    It looks like nothing much has changed in the lower end of the labor market.

  4. Dan says:

    It’s not possible to motivate people…either they have it or they don’t. More $$$ won’t change that.
    I see plenty of trained healthcare professionals who routinely wander through their day working as slowly and inefficiently as possible to minimize the actual amount of work they must do. It’s NOT just “low end” workers….it’s a problem across the entire spectrum of society.

Comments are closed.