Operative caught out trying to dupe Wa-Po.

Of course, they’re gloating over having caught her.

A woman who falsely claimed to The Washington Post that Roy Moore, the Republican U.S. Senate candidate in Alabama, impregnated her as a teenager appears to work with an organization that uses deceptive tactics to secretly record conversations in an effort to embarrass its targets.

In a series of interviews over two weeks, the woman shared a dramatic story about an alleged sexual relationship with Moore in 1992 that led to an abortion when she was 15. During the interviews, she repeatedly pressed Post reporters to give their opinions on the effects that her claims could have on Moore’s candidacy if she went public.

The Post did not publish an article based on her unsubstantiated account. When Post reporters confronted her with inconsistencies in her story and an Internet posting that raised doubts about her motivations, she insisted that she was not working with any organization that targets journalists.

But on Monday morning, Post reporters saw her walking into the New York offices of Project Veritas, an organization that targets the mainstream news media and left-leaning groups. The organization sets up undercover “stings” that involve using false cover stories and covert video recordings meant to expose what the group says is media bias.

James O’Keefe, the Project Veritas founder who was convicted of a misdemeanor in 2010 for using a fake identity to enter a federal building during a previous sting, declined to answer questions about the woman outside the organization’s offices on Monday morning shortly after the woman walked inside.

“I am not doing an interview right now, so I’m not going to say a word,” O’Keefe said.

This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to O’KEEFE BUSTED

  1. bogsidebunny says:

    Hopefully, the dominoes are going to start falling one-by-one.

  2. Leonard Jones says:

    The WaPo knew who she was. They not only had no problem accepting two
    Democrat party activists with zero corroboration, they enthusiastically pushed
    fake news stories by a third accuser based on an obviously forged document.
    My guess is that the questions by the Project Veritas plant raised their
    suspicions. I am willing to bet that if she played her cards right, the WaPo
    would have egg all over their faces right now!

  3. redneckgeezer says:

    Win some, lose some, but O’Keefe hasn’t lost many. It shouldn’t change a thing other than perhaps these dumb asses will now be a bit complacent thinking O’Keefe is too embarrassed and won’t come after them again. He’s not going to quit exposing dishonesty, hypocrisy, and corruption.

  4. B Woodman says:

    Looks like PV is becoming too well known, and a victim of its own success.

  5. Eskyman says:

    I don’t think we’ve heard the last of this story.

    This looks like WaPo is trying to fire the first shot, so that it will look like they’re on the winning side, but their hand is being forced. They had to put in the misleading “the Project Veritas founder who was convicted of a misdemeanor” crap which is totally irrelevant, but intended to make the reader think that O’Keefe is a shady character Up To No Good.

    Soon, the broadside from Project Veritas will blow the WaPo’s credibility out of the water; that’s my bet anyway! (Yeah, I know they don’t have any credibility to begin with….)

  6. Leonard Jones says:

    Eskyman, interesting theory. If Project Veritas has already been had, it
    would make sense for them to preempt. This is the standard M.O. of
    the left. If they know they are going to take a hit, this makes sense!

Comments are closed.