FEMALE; HYPHENATED NAME; LIVES IN D.C.; A JUDGE

Any surprise when you read what she did?

Appointed by Clinton; allowed parks to ban concealed carry; allowed D.C. to restrict gun sales.

Now?

She orders recruiters to accept trans-weirdos:

And these abominations are what our soldiers and airmen are supposed to work next to:

A judge says she has the authority to countermand the Commander in Chief’s July decision to reject transgender applicants for military service, highlighting the judiciary’s continued efforts to seize political power from legislators and President Donald Trump.

The claim was made October 30, when Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia denounced Trump’s ‘Presidential Memorandum’ ending President Barack Obama’s policy of recruiting people who think they are members of the opposite sex.

She insisted that Trump’s policy be blocked pending a full trial:

The Court will preliminarily enjoin Defendants from enforcing the following directives of the [Trump] Presidential Memorandum, referred to by the Court as the Accession and Retention Directives:

I am directing the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the U.S. Coast Guard, to return to the longstanding policy and practice on military service by transgender individuals that was in place prior to June 2016 until such time as a sufficient basis exists upon which to conclude that terminating that policy and practice would not have the negative effects discussed above.

The judge ordered the Pentagon to continue Obama’s policy of recruiting people who think they are members of the opposite sex, pending a trial and a final decision. The Democratic-nominated judge also insisted that the Trump’s policy would hurt the military, declaring that:

On the record before the Court, there is absolutely no support for the claim that the ongoing service of transgender people would have any negative effective on the military at all. In fact, there is considerable evidence that it is the discharge and banning of such individuals that would have such effects.

The lawsuit was brought by progressive groups, including the National Center for Lesbian Rights, after Trump reversed Obama’s pro-transgender policies, even though Obama has admitted twice that those policies helped Trump get elected.

Obama’s Pentagon transgender policy reached far beyond military readiness because it marked federal support for the core ideological demand made by transgender activists — that the government must compel Americans to treat a man as a woman (or vice versa) if he says he has an opposite-sex “gender identity,” even if the man has not taken any female hormones or undergone genital cosmetic surgery.

The judge endorsed this dramatic “gender identity” ideological claim, saying:

The Court holds that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their Fifth Amendment claim. As a form of government action that classifies people based on their gender identity, and disfavors a class of historically persecuted and politically powerless individuals, the President’s directives are subject to a fairly searching form of scrutiny. Plaintiffs claim that the President’s directives cannot survive such scrutiny because they are not genuinely based on legitimate concerns regarding military effectiveness or budget constraints, but are instead driven by a desire to express disapproval of transgender people generally. The Court finds that a number of factors— including the sheer breadth of the exclusion ordered by the directives, the unusual circumstances surrounding the President’s announcement of them, the fact that the reasons given for them do not appear to be supported by any facts, and the recent rejection of those reasons by the military itself—strongly suggest that Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment claim is meritorious.

When implemented in the military, the transgender ideology forces female soldiers to give “dignity and respect” to transsexual men who join them in their shared shower rooms, according to Obama-era training manuals leaked by soldiers in a mandatory class. But this “dignity and respect” is a one-way street, according to the training slides, which were developed by officials working for former President Barack Obama. “Transgender Soldiers are not required or expected to modify or adjust their behavior based on the fact that they do not ‘match’ other Soldiers,” according to the slides, which were first leaked by TheFederalist.com.

In general, transgender activists want the federal government to wipe out the different, overlapping and complementary civic expectations for men and women in a two-sex society. These expectations include sexual privacy in single-sex showers, matched competition in male or female sports leagues, psychological reassurance in women’s shelters, as well as distinct male and female ideals for appearance and accomplishment.

This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to FEMALE; HYPHENATED NAME; LIVES IN D.C.; A JUDGE

  1. BobF says:

    The courts need to be kept out of military decisions. Just think if we had to go to war and a judge ruled against it. Lawyers in black robes have no place deciding on military readiness.

  2. Then those judges should be detained until the end of the war.
    Oh, I thought I recognized Kollar-Kotelly’s name…she was the judge on the US v Microsoft case! Imagine that.

  3. Deplorable B Woodman says:

    Wait…….what? “She’s” a judge. She is supposed to judge by THE LAW, as passed by Kongress and signed by the President. What President Trump countermanded was an Executive Order from former president O’Bozo. It was not law. So the judge has no jurisdiction, and needs to shut her furry piehole.

  4. Deplorable B Woodman says:

    Besides that, I thought the DildoCrats were supposed to be big on “democracy”, rule of the majority. All these LGBTXYZs make up no more then 3-5% of the US population. So by imposing this ruling, the judge is imposing this lifestyle of the perverted minority onto the majority.

    And rights are being violated? What rights are being violated? Last I ever heard, there was NO right to be able to join the military, to sweat to reach peak physical condition, to train to perform tasks in defense of country, to bleed and even die for that country.

  5. Leonard Jones says:

    Deplorable, I have to expand on what you said. If you count the number of
    T’s in this alphabet soup of weirdo sexual excrement, they are the tiniest
    percent of the lot. The vast majority of this .1 percent are still sporting
    original equipment.

    Those who actually go through with mutilation are already batshit crazy and
    most end up offing themselves. My solution would be simple: Take the
    4 males in the photo and drive them to a military hospital then give them two
    choices; Have the operation at once or resign from the military. Every one of
    those dick-smoking homos left in the military would form a stampede in their
    attempts out the base gates!

    The best way to get rid of them (male or female) is to give them what they
    claim to want.

  6. B Woodman says:

    LJ,
    Unfortunately, I think that is what they would want.
    Part of the reason many of the LGBTXYZ crowd join/want to join the military, is that if they manage to serve honorably, then they get to have Uncle Sugar foot their medical bills (operations, medications, hormones, therapy, etc) for the rest of their miserable misbegotten lives.

    But if you’re talking about average third world medical treatments (unsanitary, reused unsterilized surgical equipment, wrong medications, unattended for days, etc), then I say YES! let them join and get such (sub)standard treatment. It would be a self-correcting problem (I love those kind). Either they DON’T join the military, or they join and die.

  7. BobF says:

    Leonard, I think most of them want in the military so the military will perform the sex reassignment surgery which will be on the taxpayers dime. Once the military does this, then the VA will be responsible for all related medical care for the rest of their lives. Plus, they can claim PTSD and get a VA disability check too.

    This crap of “just wanting to serve my country” is just crap. All my military career I never heard anyone say they enlisted because they just wanted to serve their country. I heard dozens of reasons folks joined but never that one.

  8. Leonard Jones says:

    Bob, I cannot remember the exact number involved but the number of the
    trannies who excise their package actually is microscopically tiny! The majority
    want to keep their shit because they lose totally and forever the ability to
    derive sexual pleasure.

Comments are closed.