GIVEN THE DIFFERENCES WHICH WOULD YOU HAVE DEFENDING YOUR COUNTRY?

And yet the international community rails against us for having the military hardware we do.

carriers
The Royal Navy’s new supercarrier HMS Queen Elizabeth and her battle group met the U.S. Navy’s carrier USS George H.W. Bush in the North Atlantic for an exercise beginning on Aug. 1, 2017.

The 10-day exercise Saxon Warrior 2017 “allows both U.S. and U.K. naval forces a chance to hone our interoperability skills,” said Rear Adm. Kenneth Whitesell, commander of Bush‘s Carrier Strike Group 2. “Particularly important is the alignment of U.S. carrier strike groups and the U.K. carrier strike group.”

Both navies — and one NATO ally — sent ships and crews to the exercise. But one key component is missing. While Bush deploys with an air wing including helicopters, radar planes, electronic-warfare planes and no fewer than 40 F/A-18 fighters, Queen Elizabeth still doesn’t carry any fixed-wing planes — and won’t do so until late 2018.

Ships participating in Saxon Warrior 2017 include the cruiser USS Philippine Sea, the destroyer USS Donald Cook and the Norwegian frigate HNoMS Helge Insgstad, plus the Royal Navy Type 23 frigates Westminster and Iron Duke, the Royal Fleet Auxiliary tanker Wave Ruler and the Royal Navy submarine Trenchant. Land-based British helicopters and planes have also joined in.

The war game includes simulated combat and shooting drills with live ammunition. There is reportedly a major anti-submarine component, presumably involving Trenchant hunting one or both carriers while, in turn, the escort vessels hunt the sub.

That Queen Elizabeth is exercising with Bush without an air wing is, in a sense, the point. The Royal Navy is still in the process of reconstituting its carrier aviation capability, having prematurely retired its Harrier jump jets in 2010 and the last of its three light carriers in 2016. Queen Elizabeth launched in July 2017 and should enter active service around 2020. Her sister ship Prince of Wales is scheduled to launch some time in 2017.

The Saxon Warrior exercise could help prepare the Royal Navy’s Naval Strike Wing for embarking F-35B stealth jump jets in late 2018. Bush anchored outside Portsmouth — Queen Elizabeth‘s future home port — in the days preceding the exercise in order to embark 65 British pilots, staff, maintainers and deck crew for training alongside their more-experienced American counterparts.

“This exercise is a great demonstration of the U.K.’s relationship with the United States who are helping us in getting back our carrier strike capability,” said Royal Marines colonel Phil Kelly, the British carrier group’s strike commander.

Queen Elizabeth herself is due to arrive at Portsmouth in early August 2017, having met and exercised with Bush en route.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Misc. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to GIVEN THE DIFFERENCES WHICH WOULD YOU HAVE DEFENDING YOUR COUNTRY?

  1. Leonard Jones says:

    I say it is about time to pull the old BB’s out of mothballs since it looks like
    we are about to have a party in the Far East. Those Iowa class battleships
    may be doing museum duty, but they can be recalled into service.

    Not that we really need them to do anything more than scare the shit out
    of Norks and display our resolve, but seeing Kim Dong Dork shit his
    pants at the array whoop ass that is coming his way would be priceless!

  2. BobF says:

    The Brits need to do a better job of security for their new carrier.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/drone-enthusiast-avoids-detection-lands-081557747.html

  3. Dan says:

    You really can’t compare the two….different designs, different missions. It would be better to compare them to how we used flattops in WWII with the larger Essex class carriers taking the fight to the Jap navy and the smaller escort carriers doing other jobs such as providing air support to land operations etc. Both sizes have a place in an integrated war plan. What actually surprises me is that Britain spent the money to build a carrier at all. They aren’t cheap and that’s a lot of money stupid pols could have used to buy votes with.

Comments are closed.